Yeedi Vac Station vs. Roomba I3 vs. Roomba I6

With the growing popularity of auto-discharge vacuum cleaners, more and more brands have developed their own versions. One of them is the Yeedi Vac Station, and in this comparison, we’ll look at how it compares to the iRobot, specifically the Roomba I3 and I6.

I’ve added Roomba I6 here so More expensive than VAC station Because they both use the same navigation sensors, which are VSLAM.

Yeedi Vac Station and Roomba I3 are very similar in price, so it is interesting to know which option is better. After spending many hours testing these bots, you may find some interesting results.

Overview of Yeedi Vac Station vs Roomba I3 vs Roomba I6

I used an anemometer to measure the airflow at the brush roll, the numbers you see at the highest setting. Yeedi has three power settings, while both Roomba options only have one.

Deep cleaning is done with 100g of fine sand rubbed on a medium pile rug. I take the test two or three times to get an average score.

To get the noise levels, I use an audiometer from a few meters away.

Introduction to Yeedi Vac Station, Roomba I3 + and Roomba I6 +

A quick look at Amazon reveals one thing – more self-dumping bot options are popping up. And the pioneer of this trend is none other than iRobot when it unveiled the i7+ years ago.

Yeedi Vac Station is one such contender, and let’s see how it stacks up against the original brand that started it all.

Please note that the I6+ here is a variant similar to the Roomba I7+. They both have the same engine, litter box and automatic base station. I haven’t tested the I7+, so I can’t speak to the airflow or cleaning performance, but it’s similar.

One difference is the accessories out of the box. The I7+ comes with more than the I6+; For this reason it is more expensive.

Least Expensive of the Three: Yeedi Vac . Station

The Yeedi Vak Station It is the cheapest alternative to the three self-emptying robots shown here, but its features indicate otherwise.

This variant has the most airflow at 23 CFM at the highest setting. It has the same navigation as the Roomba I6+, which means that it uses a VSLAM or a combination of the top-mounted camera, VSLAM, and an optical sensor to track movement and location.

I’ve Read comments in My video review About that Yeedi is owned by Ecovacs since they use most of the same ingredients, except for LIDAR.

It’s no surprise to her Same power output as Ecofax T8 AIVIwhich uses a similar engine.

This is amazing Auto blank robot Uses bag system 2.5 liter capacity.

Like the Roomba I3 and I6, it also has a ramp-shaped base station where the robot sits, but the Yeedi has two ports instead of the one in the Roomba.

I like the ramp design because it provides better stability and no alignment issues.

Roomba’s cheapest auto-discharge option: Roomba I3 +

iRobot released a file Roomba I3 + To fill a glaring gap in their lineup with budget self-dumping options (between $400 and $550).

Although described as a “budget” option, it is still expensive. More expensive than most other brands in this category like Yeedi, sharkAnd UltenicFor example, but not limited.

Lowering the price means removing some features, and for the I3+, most tasks come with their own navigation sensors.

The i3+ doesn’t have a top-mounted camera found on the I6, I7, and S9 variants, so it can’t recognize landmarks. Also, it doesn’t have SLAM, which means it can’t save maps, and consumers won’t have access to containment and area cleanup features.

It is mainly based on the gyroscope, wheel counters and optical sensor for navigation.

Other variants similar to it include Roborock E4. But Roomba I3+ offers better accuracy with optional dual-path operation and dirt detection.

Although there is no VSLAM or camera, it still navigates in “tidy rows” (or straight lines).

Surprisingly, it is the most efficient of all Roomba variants that are automatically discharged I tested during the coverage test, finishing two passes in about 22 minutes.

Mid-level Roomba automatic unloading option: Roomba I6 +

The grade above Roomba I3+ is I6+. Both variants share most of the same components and design but with one important difference – mobility.

The Roomba I6 + It has a top-mounted camera and VSLAM, so it will not only navigate in straight lines but can also save maps, thus unlocking advanced features like blocking zones and selective room cleaning.

These features are not present in I3+ and the main difference between these two alternatives.

Unfortunately, it is more expensive than I3 + but It costs much less Manal Main Roomba S9+.

Choosing between I3+ and I6+ will cut short whether or not you need the map save feature.

Similarities Between Yeedi Vac Station, Roomba I3 + and Roomba I6 +

Despite belonging to different brands, there are many similarities between Yeedi and Roomba.

1. Round frame

All three robot vacuums use a circular frame, as do most robot vacuums on the market. But the Vac Station has a low profile design, measuring a touch over three inches (3.03″ to be exact).

By comparison, the Roomba I3 and I6 models are more than half an inch taller at 3.63″.

Not a huge difference, but the sleeker design allows the Yeedi to fit furniture under low clearance better.

2. Brush layout

These variants also have the same brush layout – with a single-sided brush and a primary brush.

Yeedi uses a combo brush, while Roomba uses its own patented anti-rotation straws.

3. Navigation

Another similarity between these self-emptying robots is navigation. All three are smart mobility vacuum cleaners that move in straight lines.

The Yeedi Vac and Roomba station use I6 + VSLAMIt uses a camera mounted on top and an optical sensor to track location.

It can save maps, users can add containment areas, and block the bot from restricted areas. Specific room cleaning is also available for these variants, so they provide more convenience.

The Roomba I3+ does not have VSLAM. But a combination of Gyroscopes and floor sensors for motion tracking.

It can draw a map but cannot save it; Thus, consumers cannot paint containment boxes or do area cleanup.

4. App compatibility

Most of the features of these bots are available in their own apps. Roomba I3 + and I6 + are compatible with iRobot Appwhile the Vac station corresponds to Yeedi . app.

I will discuss, in detail, the similarities and differences between these applications a few sections.

5. Convenience of self-discharge

All three have an empty base station that automatically empties the robot’s trash can after each run.

The capacity for all three is the same at around 2.5 liters, which should last at least 30 days, depending on the frequency of use and the debris cleaned daily.

Another similarity is that the robot sits on a ramp where the port is. Yeedi base station has two ports, while Roomba has one.

One difference between Yeedi and Roomba is that the latter has a sensor to let users know if it’s full, while the Yeedi doesn’t, so you’ll have to do an eye test to check.

Differences between Yeedi Vac Station, Roomba I3 + and Roomba I6 +

Now, let’s look at the differences between these bots.

1. Roll brush

Yeedi uses a traditional combo brush with V-style rubber blades and bristles.

In comparison, Roomba uses the latest dual bristle rubber extractors that are among the best in the industry for agitation.

While the Yeedi have significantly more airflow, these Roombas still scored higher in our deep cleaning tests, mainly due to the excellent aeration these hoods provide.

2. Dustbin design

The Roomba I3 + and I6 + have a rear-mounted trash can Same capacity 400ml. But that figure goes up to 500ml for the non-extra I3 variant because it doesn’t have that grade inside.

Regardless, I highly recommend going to the plus version since the clean base station offers a self-discharge convenience not found in the I3 standard.

It is located at Yeedi Vac . station Slightly larger capacity at 420ml. I like the Vac Station because it has two ports underneath with no notches, so it doesn’t sacrifice size.

Having two ports means more debris can be taken out inside the trash, in theory, than a base station with a single port.

3. Live Map

One glaring absence of iRobot’s smart robot vacuums is the lack of a live map. Roomba I6 does not have this feature, so there is no way to know where the bot is in real time.

I’m not sure why iRobot didn’t have this feature, but it’s something they should consider adding in future app rollouts.

Yeedi has a live map although there is no LIDAR. It shows where the bot is located on the map, but it lacks the lines you’d see on LIDAR bots like DreameTech or Roborock.

4. Number of maps

Unfortunately, Yeedi app can do that Save only one map. I tried to update it recently, and it still only managed to save one.

Regardless of the variable, everything iRobot variants equipped with VSLAM can save up to tenwhich is more than enough in most homes.

In each map level, users can add clean areas and block areas as needed.

5. Cleansing

One of the features that Yeedi Vac Station has on Roomba I3 and I6 is Its ability to sweep floors.

If you want the same scanning feature with iRobot, you will need to purchase Braava scanning bots, which is an additional cost.

she has 240ml electronic water tankallowing users to precisely control the flow of water through the app.

I tested it with a red wine stain, and it was able to erase stains almost as well as the Roborock S5 Max, leaving a relatively streak-free surface after the wiping process.

He didn’t remove all the stains after one round of two passes but at least he cleaned most of them. After the second round of two passes, the spots were gone.

Please note that the mop does not have any agitation, as you will see in Roborock S7Just pull a damp pad over the surface.

Another noteworthy feature is the carpet sensor, which enables it to avoid carpeting if the wiping pad is connected.

I don’t recommend it for removing sugary stains because it will leave a sticky residue.

App Features for Yeedi Vac Station, Roomba I3 + and Roomba I6 +

Both brands have smartphone apps that unlock all the features. It’s an important reason why these bots don’t have a remote control. Consumers will need a WIFI connection to connect the bot and the app, and it is Only compatible with 2.4GHz connections.

1. Live Map [Yeedi Vac Station]

Only Yeedi Vac Station has the live map. It is one of the features I look for in a robot vacuum because it provides a real-time view of the location of the robot.

Not an essential feature, keep in mind, but it might be helpful to see if the bot is stuck somewhere.

2. Save map [Yeedi Vac Station and Roomba I6+]

Yeedi Vac Station and Roomba I6+ both have map saves since they both have VSLAM. One difference is Yeedi can only save one mapwhile the I6 + can save ten.

Unfortunately, the Roomba I3+ can’t save maps Because it does not have SLAM or the camera installed on top.

Containment and selective room cleaning [Yeedi Vac Station and Roomba I6+]

Of the three robots here, Yeedi Vac Station and Roomba I6 + It has selective containment and room cleaning thanks to VSLAM.

iRobot calls its version “exclusion zones,” so users can draw rectangular and square compositions on the app that block the robot’s path.

Yeedi calls its version “virtual borders”, but it has the same functionality.

Unfortunately, Neither of these devices has a virtual wall featureThere is no way to draw diagonal lines to block the robot.

Yeedi Vac station and Roomba I6+ also have selective room cleaning.

After creating the map, users can divide the regions manually and name each region accordingly. One difference is that the iRobot app allows custom names, while Yeedi does not.

Yeedi has the same feature as cleaning zones, but you can’t save these chests.

Cleaning zones is another similarity Where users can define rectangular or square areas The robot will clean up. Again, iRobot has the advantage here because it can save these areas for quick access.

The Roomba I3+ does not have ‘blocking zones’, so consumers will have to rely on the iRobot virtual wall extension to do the same job.

4. Vacuum options

Both brands provide consumers with many options for customizing settings.

Yeedi offers more customization options than the iRobot – it has three power settings versus just one for the i3 and i6.

Users also have the option to choose between one or two track playback for all three models.

The Yeedi app has an auto-boost setting where the robot automatically increases suction when it detects carpet. Neither Roomba I3 nor I6 has this feature since then It only has one power mode.

5. Scheduling

These three variants have a scheduling feature with the option to assign multiple runs per day.

One difference is that the iRobot app contains a file A gap of at least three hours per runWhile my hand does not.

I think iRobot set this time gap due to the smaller battery and shorter runtime; Hence more time is needed to recharge.

Yeedi Vac Station and Roomba I6+ allow users to choose a specific room for cleaning.

6. History

Users can also view the bot’s cleaning history using this tab. Shows previous cleaning cycles along with corresponding maps, room size, and more.

Navigation comparison

As I said earlier, these three robots are considered “intelligent navigation robots,” which means that each can move in straight lines and track location.

Yeedi Vac Station and Roomba I6+ have VSLAM, so it has this map save element absent in Roomba I3+.

this means Previous Access to other features Such as containment and selective cleaning of the room, while i3 + no.

Since these bots have sensors that enable them to track location, each option has a recharge and resume feature and will resume cleaning if the battery is low.

It is a need for Roomba due to its short runtime (75 for 200 minutes) from Yeedi.

All three did reasonably well on the coverage test, getting roughly the same amount, more or less.

But Yedi was the most efficient, finishing the race in just over 13 minutes.

1. Yedidi Vak Station: 13:25 minutes
2. Roomba I3+: 22:43 minutes
3. Roomba I6+: 32:33 minutes

The I3+ was the next most effective option at 22 minutes and change, while the I6+ was the least efficient, taking over 32 minutes to complete the task.

One reason could be “dirt detection”, where the robot made several passes back and forth at different points.

But the main takeaway was that Roomba’s choices were more inconclusive than Yeedi’s, which has a slightly better refinement.

Air Flow Comparison

Yeedi has the highest airflow results Of the three alternatives, Max at 23 CFM. And there is no significant drop at the two lower power settings, so there is usable power even outside of max+.

Roomba I3 + and I6 + You have a lot less at 7.27 CFM and 8.2 CFMStraight.

These two devices won’t dazzle you with their high airflow, but their patented hoods make up for the difference in airflow with remarkable excitement.

cleaning comparison

Next, we’ll look at how these two brands compare to cleaning different types of debris. I used a mix of Quaker oats, quinoa, sand, pet litter, and coffee grounds.

Here are the results.

If you look at the overall averages, there isn’t much difference between the three (about 1%).

Roomba I6 + has the extension Best overall result at 93.97% From the Yeedi Vac station (93.8%), but the difference is so small, I can’t say for sure that the I6+ is better.

One factor in favor of Yeedi is higher airflow, but both Roomba products have better excitement.

Which is better on hard floors?

Thanks to the high airflow, Yeedi Vac . Station Do the best hard surface cleaning.

I scored the highest with my benchmark tests (Quaker oats, quinoa, pet litter, and coffee grounds) and are hard to sand at 98.25% and 99.5%Straight.

These results confirm High Air Flow for Yeedi Vacمحطة StationAnd an eye test corroborates these numbers with the cleanest lanes on this surface.

The hard floor sand test results are among the best among the robot vacuums I’ve tested, just behind other airflow monsters like Roborock S4 MaxAnd Roomba S9And and Roomba 980.

Edge cleaning comparison

For this test, the Roomba I3+ and Yeedi Vac Station are close together based on the eye test – with nearly identical before and after images.

This is a shot of Yeedi Vac’s before and after station.

and Roomba I3+.

It was no surprise that Yeedi was the best because she had the highest airflow.

The Roomba I6+ performed the worst, despite having more airflow than the I3+.

Hair wrap comparison

Another experiment I did with these three products was the Hair Wrap Test, where I experimented with how each would resist tangles from five and seven inch strands.

The I6+ fared best overall with 5 and 7-inch hairs achieving 100% and 54% lift, while I3+ achieved the worst at 58% and 40%.

One of the things I love about Roomba extractors is how easy they are to clean. Yes, the percentage will twist, but to get it out will not require scissors.

Pulling it out will be sufficient in most cases, unlike a Yeedi brush, where you may need to clip it to get it out.

Which is better on the carpet?

Based on capture tests, the Roomba I6+ was Better with surface debris (97.55%)i3 + scored the highest point in Deep cleaning tests (84.7%).

Yeedi Vac station is not far for both classes, with 96.87% (surface) and 80% (deep cleaning) Scores on these tests.

My point is cleaning performance It should not be a major determining factor Because the difference is not great.

All of these options will do the job well enough. But if your home has pets, I would recommend I6+ since extracts are easier to maintain and should be better tolerated in the long run.

Other than that, you can’t go wrong with any of these three.

Runtime comparison

Yeedi has a huge advantage over I3+ and I6+ with its uptime Thanks to the 5200mAh Li-ion battery.

The 200 minutes VAC station runtime More than double my choice Roomba here Only run for up to 75 minutes.

This type of battery is used by many Roomba competitors such as Roborockand Dreame and Ecovacs.

Recharging and resuming somewhat negates the smaller radius it can cover, but it will take longer to complete.

I would say that VAC station is More suitable for large homeswhile the I3 and I6 It will work well inside small to medium sized dwellings.

noise comparison

Although the airflow output is doubled, the noise test results are close.

Yeedi was actually less noisy at lower settings, Less than 59.5 dB In eco mode and maximum at 66.1 dB – only a few dB higher than I3 (64.9 dB) and I6 (64.5 dB).

So the engineers at Yeed did a pretty good job of muting the noise.

maintenance

One aspect that is not talked about on most of the review sites is the maintenance of the robot vacuum. And for robot vacuums, they are perhaps the most important component of longevity, more than a vacuum or upright vacuum.

How well you take care of these high tech machines will bode well for your long-term ownership.

It’s no different for these three variants, so I’m going to highlight the essential components that need to be cleaned or replaced.

1. brush roll: The most abused part of any robot vacuum cleaner is the base brush, as hair and other contaminants either get stuck in or stick to the surface. Check this once a week and clean up if necessary.
2. Side brush: Another ingredient that takes a beating is the side brush. Hair tends to wrap around the arms and base, so check and clean if there is buildup.
3. Wheels: These robots have three wheels, two side wheels, and a swivel wheel. Use a clean cloth to wipe these parts and remove any dirt stuck to the surface.
4. fall sensors: Underneath these robots are a set of sensors that prevent the robot from falling off cliff points. Use a clean, dry microfiber towel to wipe to avoid releasing an error code.
5. Dustbin and filter: Having a base station that empties automatically doesn’t mean you don’t check your trash. On the contrary, you should check regularly (two or three times a month) to clean any buildup inside and check the filter. Litter boxes for all three types are washable, but HEPA filters are not. Be sure to replace after three or four months to prevent performance deterioration.
6. Automatically empty base station: Keep the ports clear of obstructions and replace the bag when it is full. iRobot has a sensor to let users know if this is the case, but Yeedi doesn’t, so you’ll have to do a visual check.
7. the body: Wipe the robot’s body with a clean, dry cloth to remove any fingerprints and dust buildup, especially the area above the camera (Yeedi and Roomba I6+).

Availability of spare parts

iRobot has the advantage here, being the most popular product, and it’s easy to find spare parts for I3 and I6, such as battery, side wheels and other more obscure parts.

These two variables share most of the same components. They both use the same basic framework.

But Yeedi has decent availability, at least with parts like the filter, combo brush, and side brush.

Product Spec.

Where can I buy these bots?

These self-discharging robotic vacuums are available in online stores such as Amazon. Check out the links below for the latest pricing information.

• Yeedi Vac Station

BUY NOW FROM AMAZON

• Roomba I3+

BUY NOW FROM AMAZON

• Roomba I6+

BUY NOW FROM Amazon

Disclaimer: I’ll earn a commission if you buy through any of the links above, but at no additional cost to you, so it’s a win for us!

What is the best option? Yeedi Vac station, Roomba I3 + or Roomba I6 +?

Before making this comparison, I didn’t expect Yeedi to clean up too This is Roombas, honestly. iRobot is known for making high quality robots that clean well.

So for Yeedi Performance on par with iRobot It was a pleasant surprise because we the consumers benefit the most by having a less expensive alternative to emptying cars.

Cleaning performance should not be a deciding factor, but other features you may prioritize, and I’ll summarize the reasons for each option below.

5 reasons to choose Yeedi Vac . Station

1. The least expensive option: Yeedi is by far the cheapest alternative out of the three variants presented here.
2. Outperforms hard surfaces: The high airflow enabled the Vac station to obtain the best results on hard surfaces in different experiments.
3. Most effective: This robot vacuum was the most efficient in the coverage test, finishing up in just 13 minutes – nearly 10 minutes faster than the Roomba I3+.
4. Best features of the app: Yeedi app offers better comprehensive features than iRobot app.
5. Scan feature: One advantage that the Vac Station has over these Roomba products is its ability to mop floors.

4 reasons to choose Roomba I3 +

1. The best in deep cleaning: The score of 84.7% on the compact sand was the best of the three.
2. Cheaper than i6+: This variant is a more affordable alternative to the I6+ and S9+.
3. Availability of parts: Consumers will enjoy better parts availability for the I3+ since it shares many of the same components as the Roomba E5.
4. Better efficiency than i6+: Despite the lack of VSLAM, I3+ was more efficient than I6+ to finish the round in ten minutes less.

Reasons to choose Roomba I6 +

1. Great for brushing hair: The i6+ was the best overall at cleaning five and seven inch threads, and got the highest score.
2. Saves up to 10 maps: Nine map levels can provide more than Yeedi app and is probably a better choice if you need something for a multi-storey house.
3. Best in class cleaning performance: This variant scored the highest in the cleaning tests.
4. Cheaper alternative than Roomba S9+: If the S9+ is out of your budget, the i6+ is your next best choice for iRobot shoppers.

Verdict: Yeedi is a compelling cheaper alternative

After spending many hours testing this product and compiling the results, Yeedi Vac محطة Station It is a convincing alternative To Roomba I3 + and I6 +, with almost identical cleaning results.

it’s the The best choice on hard floors With high airflow and the best cleaning for low-clearance furniture because it has a slimmer design.

One of my concerns is the availability of parts because this is brand new, but with Ecovacs as its parent company, I don’t think it should be a big concern.

Another reason why VAC station is compelling is the scanning feature – Something not available with Roomba I3 and I6.

The Roomba I3 and I6 are solid options With an excellent track record, and with its popularity, spare parts availability will not be an issue. But both are more expensive, but it is the safer option if long-term ownership and strength are a top priority.