Shark Vertex Cordless Review (IZ462H)

The biggest problem with previous Duo Clean models is Inability to resist hair tangling. It was a concern for the Shark ION P50, which couldn’t even capture the shorter five-inch leads.

shark It aims to address these concerns With the redesigned Duo Clean Head in the new Vertex (IZ462H). Instead of strong, hard shark bristles, shark Replace it with “PowerFins” Or silicone fins that are supposed to contain Better agitation and entanglement resistance properties.

I’ve spent the past few days testing it to see if these claims are true.

Positives

• PowerFins upgrade excellent in anti-tangle of the longest hair strands.
• it did not appear No visible leaks During the fog test
• Multiflex technology You will reach the depths Low Clearance Furniture
• Better than the older Duo Clean head for deep carpet cleaning (snapped more than 93%)
• Large capacity dust bin at 1.28 liters
• Excellent in Clean surface and embedded debris
• Easy to store (no dock required)

Negatives

• Duo Clean nozzle is noisy (close to 80dB)
• Steering is not as sharp as Dyson
• Lacks any sense of steering in flex mode
• The large length in manual mode makes it difficult to use in confined spaces.

Introduction to Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H

The Duo Clean nozzle has been one of the best innovations of the past five years. It has changed the way people look at vacuuming hard floors, proving that strong suction is not a prerequisite for it.

However, this technology is not perfect and has some issues. I and The most annoying is hair tangling. Cleaning was a chore because a standard brush couldn’t fend off tangles even from short strands.

Powerfins

Shark addresses this with its new “PowerFins” upgrade, which consists of silicone blades around the cylinder. Another improvement is these soft bristles, which I believe are there to pick up things like dust.

The blue arrow indicates the Shark “PowerFins” upgrade placed in the Vertex line.

If you look closely at the brush, the fins and bristles alternate in rows. The Shark goal here is to provide better thrills with silicone fins that do the traditional tough bristles you see on other brands.

Another benefit of these fins is their ability to resist hair tangling. I tested it on hair strands 12 inches longAnd the results are great (more on this in this section).

This feature works in conjunction with these combs (or teeth) above to detangle hair.

Please note that you may need to Run it on carpet mode for a minute or two To remove the hair encased on the brush.

Multi Flex

Vertex IZ462H retains the Multi-Flex system found in old Shark stick vacuum cleaners like ion flex. It’s a patented Shark feature designed to reach deep into furniture. Cleaning this area is a challenge for even the lightest of vacuum cleaners.

The transition between the stick and the bend is done by pushing this lever. Returning to the stick position is done by straightening it back to its original shape.

Another benefit of Flex is storage. Most adhesive blanks will rely on a dock or a wall-mountable bracket for vertical storage. This void does not. When the level is pressed, users can fold it until it clicks into place.

Folding it cuts the vertical space in half. Hence this can be stored in a closet.

Trash container design and capacity

It may not look bulky, but the Vertex trash can can hold more dirt than most other stick vacuums – at 1.28 liters. Not the biggest, but it’s bigger than most cordless vacuums.

I like that it is detachable, which makes it very easy to clean.

There is a lever to open the dustbin. The wide opening makes it easy to unload, but the hair will wrap around this middle component, so just tip up.

There are three filters – foam and texture in front of the engine and a HEPA filter after the engine.

The Vertex has a closed system, and I didn’t see any noticeable leaks during the fog test. So it’s an improvement over the Shark ION P50 that leaked.

The Vertex has a HEPA filter located inside the engine. It’s easy to pull off and, according to Penny, is washable.

Ergonomics and portable usability

One feature that I love with the Shark ION P50 is the light weight that the motor holds close to the base. Unfortunately, this is not the case with the Vertex, since the motor and the litter box are in the handle, like a conventional vacuum cleaner.

Moving it up increases Handles up to 1.83 kg or 4.03 lbs. Another negative is the length of the body in hand position. It’s about the length of a V11 Torque Drive.

The oversized frame does not make it ideal for handheld use since this broom is biased (designed wisely) towards cleaning floors.

Tools out of the box

You’ll get these three attachments out of the box.

1. slit tool
2. Combination Tool (Brush and Upholstery)
3. bottom stick.

My favorite is undoubtedly the lower device wand because it is the only tool I have tested that is able to clean this area of ​​my house.

This tray has less than 5 inches of space—too low for most accessories, except for this one.

I was hoping to get the full size version, but that’s better than nothing.

removable battery

Users will get one detachable battery with a Claimed run time 60 minutes With tools that are not powered in their default setting.

I tested it, and the IZ462H passed those Nine minute prompts. However, this figure is cut in half if the main nozzle is connected. I will share the results of the runtime tests in the next section.

Fortunately, the runtime can be doubled due to the availability of additional batteries.

It also scores extra points for practicality as you can charge it separately. So that users can keep one battery in standby mode while using the other connected to the vacuum cleaner.

How long is the Shark Vertex Wireless IZ462H Uptime?

Shark Vertex has three power modes – normal, carpet and maximum. There is not much difference between standard mode and carpet mode in terms of air flow. However, the brush roll rotates more quickly, which increases the fraying of the carpet. Like I said earlier, this will also help detangle the winding hair on the brush.

Here are the results of my experiments with the main nozzle:

• Hard floor laying: 36:42 minutes
• Carpet laying: 22:58 minutes

These numbers are better than Share ION P50But not much. Decent numbers for cleaning high-traffic areas, but still missing compared to other vacuum cleaners like Lube PureAnd Dyson V11 HugeAnd Torque Engine V11And Tineco Pure One S12.500 mAh.

Here are the results using the crevice tool:

• Hard floor laying: 69:50 minutes

If you’re using any non-powered tools, keep them at the default setting as there won’t be any major power bumps to move the switch to carpet position. Pull the maximum lever if needed.

How much power does a Shark Vertex Cordless have?

Another claim made by Shark is “Hyper Velocity”, which enabled this Void to obtain Stronger suction from any wireless stick.

To put this theory to the test, I measured the airflow in both the cleaning head and the extension wand, and here are the results.

First, here are the results in the nozzle.

• Hard floor laying: 28.76 cubic feet per minute
• Carpet laying: 29.64 cubic feet per minute
• Max (hard floor): 36 cubic feet per minute
• Max (carpet): 37.87 cubic feet per minute

Results in an extension tube:

• Hard floor laying: 29.63 cubic feet per minute
• Carpet laying: 29.97 cubic feet per minute
• Max (hard floor): 52.53 cubic feet per minute
• nax (rug): 53.11 cubic feet per minute

The difference between laying the hardwood floor and the carpet is too small to matter. As I said earlier, the brush roll will spin faster in the carpet setting. You will need additional suction to pull the lever.

Not sure why Shark doesn’t put a custom max setting on the slide switch. They must be confident that there is aBeing good enough As it is without the help of more air flow.

I prefer to have a custom setup, if the need arises, to avoid continuing to pull a lever.

cleaning performance

Next, we’ll look at how well the Shark Vertex Cordless handles different types of debris – from Quaker oats to heavy debris like sand.

Here are the results:

• Total: 98.4%
• Solid ground: 99.35%
• sand on hard floor: 99.7%
• carpet: 99.87%
• deep cleaning: 94.7%

One surprise during these tests was the increased pickup on carpet compared to hard surfaces. It came as a surprise to me because the Duo Clean design aims to perform better on hard surfaces. As such, this is a pleasant surprise as PowerFins has done its job.

hard floor results

• Quaker Oats: 99.4%
• Cafe floors: 98.4%
• Quinoa: 100%
• pet litter: 99.6%

I was expecting more of this vacuum on this surface, but the results are still excellent. Picked up in the ’90s in all auditions. Please note that I did not use the max setting on any of these types of debris, just the default setting.

You can see from the before and after photos that the Duo Clean nozzle did the job of picking up dirt.

The front cylinder did throw a few things forward, but it wasn’t anything substantial.

sand on hard floor

Another area in which Duo Clean excels is cleaning sand on hard floors. I picked up at a rate of 99.7% – One of the best scores ever Cordless Hard Floor Vacuum Cleaners.

He captured most of the front pass. This shows you how efficiently debris is captured, even with heavy debris like sand.

Hard floor hair wrap test

Usually for stick brooms, I would two tests One for five-inch strands and one for seven-inch hair, but that’s it. In most cases, a large portion of the hair on the brush is wrapped by a 7-inch test.

But I needed to see if these “PowerFins” could actually prevent the hair from getting tangled up on the brush.

The Duo Clean brush roll after the test is 5 inches, and hardly any hairs are wrapped up in the brush.

Next, we’ll look at the brush roll after the seven-inch test.

After testing the nine inches, there was no visible hair wrap on the brush, which is really impressive.

Here’s a closer look at the eleven inch test. It had some strings wrapped around it, but it was easy to pull.

Finally, brush after a twelve inch test.

One potential problem point could be the small side wheels on both ends – hair coiled over this area during testing.

Dual cleaning Excessive expectations. Almost nothing was wrapped up in both initial trials, so I decided to push the envelope.

Here are the full results.

• Five inch threads: 100% Inside the trash, 0% around the brush
• Seven inch (1.27 g) threads: 99.05% Inside the trash, 0.05% around the brush
• Nine inches (1.21 grams) thread: 99.5% Inside the trash, 0.5% around the brush
• 11 inch (1.76g) threads: 97% Inside the trash, 3% around the brush
• Twelve inch (1.23 grams) yarn: 82.9% 17.1% inside the trash around the brush

* The number in parentheses represents the amount of hair scattered over the surface.

I went Above and more than one gram It’s hair that I usually use in most of these experiments because I want to pressure-test it to see its limits.

Even with 12 inches of long strands, it rose over 82%, which is pretty impressive for him Any cordless vacuum cleaner.

These tests show that PowerFins are practical, not just hype.

Edge cleaning

Another proof of effective cranking is the edge-cleaning test. I picked up almost all the ground coffee I sprinkled in this area around four aisles, along with the stuff in the quarter-inch crevice. Of course, it took more to get to the edges, but I like the efficiency.

Carpet cleaning

One of the surprises during the testing phase was how well the Shark Vertex wireless pickup on the mat. It was one of the best grades of all the cordless vacuums I’ve tested, Better than the more expensive V11 Torque Drive and V10 Absolute based on percentages.

I actually pulled the Max lever to get an extra boost after the initial passes, which contributed to the high score.

But the ability to clean debris so well on this surface is a huge bonus for consumers looking for it Something cheaper than Dyson.

Low stack results

• Quaker Oats: 99.2%
• Cafe floors: 99.8%
• Quinoa: 100%
• pet litter: 100%

There are high scores across the board, even with a good coffee grounds, that most vacuum cleaners struggle to capture.

You can see in the pictures above; He left only a minimum of ground coffee, which confirms the high result.

Mid-stack results

• Quaker Oats: 100%
• Cafe floors: 100%
• Quinoa: 100%
• pet litter: 100%

Picking up 100% across the board on a thicker pile carpet is impressive for a not-so-premium cordless vacuum cleaner. This vacuum pulled it thanks to superior cranking, despite the average airflow.

Deep cleaning results

The biggest flaw in the old Duo Clean Armor is its inability to deeply clean carpets well. This is no longer the case with the new Shark Vertex Cordless.

I picked up With an average of 93.85% in both tests In the default carpet setting! Yes, this is not a typo. The result is not far from other brands like Tineco A11 and Dyson V8. However, the difference is that the Vertex does not require additional suction increases.

So it is a more practical option for carpet cleaning if the options are like Dyson V11 Torque or Large Engine Expensive.

the number rises to 96.4% at maximum setting. But you will have to constantly pull the lever to get extra suction.

Roll the hair on the carpet

Next, let’s take a look at how well the Shark Vertex caught the cordless hair on the carpet.

Some pictures for your reference. First, a closer look after the five-inch test.

Here’s a closer look at the seven-inch tester – no hair visible yet.

After testing the nine inches where some strands are twisted, but still manageable.

This is a shot after an 11-inch test, similar to the one on hardwood floors where a few strands are wrapped on the brush.

Finally, results in the 12-inch test were 1.55 grams of hair — 50% more than the usual 1-gram test.

Here are the results:

• Five inch threads: 99% Inside the trash, 1% around the brush
• Seven inch (1.33 grams) thread: 100% Inside the trash, 0% around the brush
• Nine inches (1.18 grams) thread: 99.8% Inside the trash, 0.2% around the brush
• 11 inch (1.22g) threads: 98.3% Inside the trash, 1.7% around the brush
• Twelve inch (1.55g) threads: 82.5% 17.5% inside the trash around the brush
• Twelve inch (1.13 grams) yarn: 91% Inside the trash 9% around the brush

* The number in parentheses represents the amount of hair scattered over the surface.

Once again, impressive results Consider the amount of hair involved. I usually only use 1 gram because it’s the limit for most wireless spaces and so is a good benchmark.

You will notice there Two Twelve Inch Tests. I purposely did a second experiment to see how much Duo Clean head would pick up if I reduced the amount, and I got more!

These tests show the ability of PowerFins and combs to prevent hair from curling up on the brush.

How Noisy is the Shark Vertex IZ462H?

One downside with increased excitation and silicone fins is the noise it produces.

First, let’s look at the audiometer test results (With cleaning head attached).

• Solid ground: 76.3 dB
• carpet: 78.9 dB
• the above: 80.8 dB

Below are the results using the slit tool in portable mode.

• Solid ground: 77.4 dB
• carpet: 78 dB
• the above: 80.2 dB

It broke the 75 dB mark in all settings and over 80 dB max. So it’s not something you want to spend a night in an apartment complex or condominium.

Availability of spare parts

There isn’t much in terms of options for parts like the Filter being a newer model in the Shark lineup. I tried searching for “Shark Vertex Cordless” on Amazon and only got results from the straight version. If you’re looking to buy filters, add model number “IZ462H” for more in-depth insight.

Unfortunately, I couldn’t find batteries on Amazon, so you’ll have to buy them directly from the share site.

Product Spec.

Where can I buy a Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H?

You can buy this versatile vacuum cleaner from online stores such as Amazon. Check out the links below for more information and the latest prices.

• Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H

BUY NOW FROM AMAZON

Disclaimer: I’ll earn a commission if you buy through the link above, but at no additional cost to you, so it’s a win for us!

Does Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H Offer Good Value?

resounding yes! Low cost alone makes the Vertex IZ462H an attractive choice for consumers looking for advanced cleaning performance from a mid-priced vacuum cleaner.

It doesn’t have the same deep cleaning ability as DysonBut it makes up for it with a better environment and at a fraction of the cost. This product is one of the best cordless vacuums in this price range for cleaning debris, plus it passed the fog test—something the ION P50 didn’t.

5 reasons to buy the Shark Vertex IZ462H Cordless.

1. Resists tangles even from long hair strands: It was the best of all the stick vacuums I tested at picking up long strands of hair.
2. Above average deep clean: PowerFins provided enough agitation to capture more than 93% of sand in deep-cleaning tests when setting up virtual carpets. Astonishing results!
3. Large capacity litter box: It may not look the part, but this vacuum can hold up to 1.28 liters of dirt at the fill line.
4. sealed system: Three excellent filters and seals throughout provide an airtight filtration system that works, as evidenced by the fog test.
5. Under stick device: My absolute favorite tool of the bunch. Will fit shallow clearance furniture (less than two inches).

Verdict: The hype is real, the powerful forces are working!

Before going into any review, I always try to put my biases aside and base what I say on the data. Shark Vertex IZ462H Headphones Make some big claimsand, for the most part, delivered those that pride themselves on real-world performance.

Upgrade “PowerFins” is inspiration in my exams This cordless vacuum cleaner can be Best for picking up strands of long hairBetter than the most expensive V11 Outsize.

else Take advantage of this technology is the best emotion On both surface and dirt deeply folded under carpet threads. Again, it’s not as good as the other premium brands, but it’s certainly in line with other more expensive “mid-price” options like the Dyson V8 in the default carpet setup.

The sealed system and stand-alone feature seal (no pun intended) is the deal for me because it provides practicality not found in traditional stick brooms.

There are certainly downsides, like average runtime (in stick vacuum mode), tire cut-outs, and less than ideal steering, but as with anything else, compromises have to be made when purchasing products like this.