Roomba 675 vs. Roomba 690

For the sake of this comparison, we’ll be looking more closely at the iRobot’s entry-level robot vacuum – the Roomba 675 vs. the 690.

These variants are excellent options for people who are looking for a skilled carpet cleaner on a budget.

The Roomba 675, in particular, is one of the best-selling robot vacuums in the budget category or vacuums under $300 on Amazon.

First, here’s a quick look at the Roomba 675 for 690

Roomba 675

*If you click on this link and make a purchase, we earn a commission at no additional cost.

Introduction to Roomba 675 for 690

As most new budget robotic vacuums become high-tech with gyroscopes and optical sensors, Roomba maintains its core business with Roomba 675 and 690.

Despite the lack of high-tech features, these two models are still some of Amazon’s most popular options.

Roomba products It is very popular because of the brush system that works very well on carpets.

Consistently high scores on carpet tests despite having a standard navigation system. The dirt-detection sensor helps in this regard as it tells the robot to focus on these areas more.

Please note that the Roomba 690 has been discontinued by iRobot, and the 675 is replacing it.

Roomba 675: entry-level price, advanced deep cleaning results

One of the reasons the Roomba 675 is so popular on Amazon despite pinball hopping is its ability to deep clean carpets.

In deep cleaning tests using 100g of sand on a medium pile rug, this was the case able to capture 83%Which is better than some more expensive robotic vacuums like Roomba I7 (79%), Neato D4 (79%), Dyson 360 Heurist (80%), Shark IQ (83%).

However, the 675 is not perfect. First, random hopping is not efficient and will not clean multiple rooms.

Finally, the side brush rotates quickly, kicking dirt around.

It wouldn’t be an issue in the real world because you would use it to clean up the dust.

If you want to use this to clean up pet droppings on tiles – just scatter it around.

Roomba 690: more expensive, same specs as 675

Looking at the product specifications, the Roomba 690 is very similar to the 675. There are some differences between the two. One is the color, the other is the trash can latch.

Like the 675, the 690 passes in a random direction, but is sophisticated enough to cover the entire area being cleaned.

The bad news is that you will have to wait a long time, and this coverage only applies to single rooms.

Because of this randomness, cleaning more than one room is challenging 690 (or 675).

It is slightly better than the 690 when it comes to deep cleaning of carpets in just over 85%Therefore, it should be considered for homes with mostly carpeted roofs.

Similarities Between Roomba 675 and 690

Let’s quickly go over the similarities of Roombas for beginners.

1. Round shape

Most Roomba robot vacuums (except for the S9) have a round shape, and these two are no exception. Each one measures 13 inches long and 3.7 inches wide. So it can go under furniture at least 3.9 inches.

2. Interface

The button interface is similar – a circular “clean” button in the middle surrounded by the spot and dock buttons.

Both also have handles that make it easy to move them around the house.

3. WIFI, Alexa and Google Assistant compatibility

One advantage like 675 and 690 is that it has WIFI. My back stiffens from time to time, and bending over to press the “cleanup” button is annoying when it flares up.

The option to access the bot through the app is attractive to me, and I like the convenience it provides at the table. These are also Alexa and Google Assistant compatible, and using voice is something more and more people are using these days.

4. Double brush

These robots have the same dual brush system found in all 600 Series robots – a bristle + mop set. It’s one of the reasons Roomba products clean carpets so well.

Here’s a look at the 675’s and 690’s opposite spinning brushes.

You can see that both variables have the same brush layout. The brushes (main and side brushes) are interchangeable.

5. One side brush

Another similarity with the 675 and 690 is that they both have one side brush. The design is the same, and they both rotate at the same speed.

6. Navigation

All Roomba 600 series robots – 614, 675 and 690 use a standard algorithm. These bots will pin in a random direction.

However, the algorithm is sophisticated enough to cover the entire area being scanned.

It is ineffective and is best suited for cleaning single rooms where its depth is most felt.

What is the difference between Roomba 675 and 690?

Roomba 675 and 690 are essentially the same robots.

Both have the same engine, the batteryand brush and layout, but there are subtle differences that I will enumerate below.

1. Color

Roomba 695 has a darker color scheme with a matte black, charcoal gray and silver button combination. In contrast, the 690 has a light gray and matte black finish. Note that polished areas can attract fingerprints, so just tip up.

2. Virtual wall

The Roomba 690 only comes with a virtual wall in the box if you buy it on Amazon.

The 675 does not come with any virtual wall – you will need to purchase a separate wall.

A virtual wall is a device that blocks the path of the bot from restricted areas.

It has two modes:

1. wall position: It fires an IR signal with a range of 10 feet, which prevents the robot from getting past it.
2. Aura mode: Instead of a straight signal, the halo mode triggers an area 4 feet in diameter that the robot cannot enter.

None of the bots support blocked lines or restricted areas found in other Roomba options like 960, I3, I7 and S9.

3. Dust box latch

Finally, there is a slight difference in the dust container latch. The 675 has a round latch, and the 690 is a trapezoid. This difference does not affect how you unload it. However, avoid picking up the robot from behind, otherwise you risk dropping it if you accidentally press the handle.

How does the Roomba 675 and 690 navigate?

Like I said earlier, 675 and 690 pass like pinball.

It alternates between random cleaning and vacuuming the edges to tidy up the panels.

However, the dirt detection system is one of the differences between these robots and other randomly operating robots.

A sensor under the robot tells it to focus on the most polluted areas. I’ve seen this in action in all cleaning tests. It’s a reason, along with the dual brushes, why the 675 and 690 are so successful at cleaning built-in sand.

As you can see above, the 690 is going in a random direction.

One problem with the Roomba 600 series is that it does not slow down and shock furniture hard.

I’ve seen it over and over again. It can be a problem for delicate furniture that can be scratched easily.

But it will not be a problem for those who do not have expensive furniture.

Application Features

The 675 and 690 will work with the iRobot Home app.

You won’t get much more when it comes to features from the Xiaomi Home app, but it is very responsive.

It has a revamped interface, and you’ll have access to basic features like scheduling.

However, you will not be able to schedule more than once a day. After selecting the day, you can’t select the same day on subsequent attempts, which I hope iRobot can handle.

This feature is the reason why I like the Xiaomi Home app.

There is also an automation tab that provides users with an option to sync with other home integration apps. Please check the screenshot below.

How powerful is the Roomba 675 and 690?

None of these robots have high airflow. Each one recorded under 10 CFM with an anemometer.

The Roomba 675 scored 8.37 CFM, and the 690 is slightly lower at 8.2 CFM.

Even if the 675 appears to be more powerful than the 690, the difference is negligible and doesn’t affect much how clean it is.

Cleaning performance comparison

Before my analysis, let’s take a look at the cleaning test results for both.

Roomba 690 has better overall scores than 675, but there is one caveat: the randomness of navigation.

It’s hard to get two perfectly identical tests because these bots lack the ability to predict something using intelligent navigation.

Also, the problem of scattering side brush debris adds to the unpredictability.

The Roomba 675 and 690 blew things away in all tests, making an even bigger mess.

However, I don’t think it’s a big deal for daily cleaning because you’re dealing with dust. It will be a problem if you use this to clean up a large pile of clutter, as you will see in the clip below.

Which is better for hardwood floors?

• Roomba 675: 93.58%
• Roomba 690: 96.4%

The Roomba 690 performed slightly better than the 675. Again, the problem is that the side brush rotates too quickly.

If you expect these robots to pick up blocks of sand on hard floors, they won’t.

As you’ve seen in my video reviews, the side brush will scatter.

Edge cleaning comparison

These robots haven’t managed to clean the edges, at least with pet droppings. I left a good piece on the edge.

The round shape and narrow brush limit its ability to clean these areas, as well as the fast-rotating brush that scatters debris.

Big wreck comparison

There will be no problems with the 675 and 690 cleaning up large debris such as Fruit Rings and Cheerios.

As you will see below, it will pick up large bits of dirt.

They both have the authorization and the instigation to do the job.

Hair wrap comparison

The Roomba 690 has tested how it fits into one gram of human hair, five to seven inches long, on hard floors and carpets.

Most of the hair is wrapped on the brush roll after the five inch test.

Didn’t do as I would have liked it to be. Most of the long strands are wrapped with a bristle brush.

Please note that neither the 690 nor the 675 contain an anti-tangle system to combat hair winding.

I’ve also tested the Roomba 675 with five to seven inches of human hair, most of which is brush-coiled.

Don’t buy either of these options if you live with pets or someone with long hair. A better alternative is Roomba E5 with rubber extracts.

Deep cleaning comparison

One reason to love Roomba products is their ability to deeply clean carpets. The Roomba 675 and 690 are among the best at doing so in the budget category.

I rub 100g of sand on a medium-pile carpet for the test and then run the robot for about five minutes,

Then, I weighed the trash (we weighed it previously empty as well) to get the results.

The weight of the box was empty and full, and here are the results.

• Roomba 690: 85.16%
• Roomba 675: 85.1%

These two options are mainly available for cleaning built-in sand on a medium-pile carpet. The 0.06% difference is minimal, so expect the same performance between the two options.

Surprisingly, these bots are better than the Roomba I7 in this test. The Roomba 690 is on par with the Roborock S5 max, and is a more expensive option.

Dirt spotting helps because it focuses on the areas with more dirt.

Dust basket comparison

While there are some differences with the release latch, the basic design of the 675 and 690 is the same.

These robots have the same dust box, the only difference is the latch. You cannot exchange these two containers.

Aside from the latch, it’s the same everywhere.

The slots have the same wide slots. It looks big, but it only holds up to 0.3 liters because the door is low, so you often have to empty the container.

One plus of the wide opening is that it is easy to empty.

Both robots have a standard filter, which is not HEPA, so it cannot block allergens.

The material on it is very thin and does not take up much space.

However, these boxes are not interchangeable – the 690 latch differs from the 675 round-shaped box.

Also, there is no sensor inside to let users know if it is full – you will have to check manually. Best practice for me is to throw it away after every cleaning cycle.

Noise level comparison

I tested both the Roomba 690 and 675 with an audio meter from a few meters away, and it was close. 690 recorded 65.7 dB while 675 was 65.6 dB.

In short, they are practically identical. The engine sound was similar for both robots.

Runtime comparison

According to Roomba, both the 675 and 690 will run for up to 90 minutes.

It’s a decent number, but the lack of a smart navigation algorithm or recharge and resume limits its coverage.

To maximize their strengths, you should move them from room to room to clean them individually.

maintenance

Maintenance work will be the same for the 675 and 690. You will need to clean these areas regularly.

1. Main brush and side brush: These ingredients take the most beating, and more often than not, things like hair and dirt build up under the side brush and primary brush axles. Check these areas at least once a week.
2. Sensors: Check the cliff sensors on the bottom of these robots and clean them with clean cotton buds or microfiber towels to function at optimum level.
3. Wheels: Perhaps the most neglected part of the robot vacuum. The 675 and 690 models had three wheels – one in the front for steering and two rubber wheels in the middle. Use a slightly damp towel and wipe these parts down.
4. Dustbin: Empty the dustbin after each cleaning cycle so dust mites do not breed. Check the filter for dirt that can build up. The filter is not washable, so do not submerge it under water.

Related: Please review this guide at Cleaning the Roomba 690.

Parts Availability

Purchasing components for any Roomba model will not be a problem. Even with older models like the Roomba 675 and 690. Since both robots use the same units, you can buy replacement parts for the 675, which will fit the 690 and vice versa.

Another reason to strongly consider these products is the ease of replacing ingredients. parts like The battery is easily replaced Using a Philips screwdriver.

If you live in the ASEAN region, parts like filters and brushes are available at stores like Amazon, Walmart, and even AliExpress.

Spec. Comparison

Model	Roomba 675	Roomba 690
Width	13″	13″
Height	3.7″	3.7″
Filter/Warranty	Standard/1-year limited	Standard/1-year limited
Virtual Wall	No	Yes
Navigation	Random	Random
Run time (Turbo mode)	90 mins.	90 mins.
Power	9 cfm	8.2 cfm
Price	Check Price	Check Price

Where can I buy these bots?

You can buy Roomba 675 and 690 from online stores such as Amazon and Walmart. Check the links below for the latest prices.

• Roomba 675
  

BUY NOW FROM AMAZON

• Roomba 690

BUY NOW FROM AMAZON

Disclaimer: I’ll earn a commission if you buy through any of the links above, but at no additional cost to you, so it’s a win-win for both of us!

Which is better, Roomba 675 or 690?

There is not much difference between these two entry-level Roomba products in terms of features.

As you will see in the performance of the deep cleaning, the strength numbers are close, with the difference being only a few percentage points.

They both run for up to 90 minutes and use a random cleaning pattern, so these robots are basically the same products.

Right now, the Roomba 675 is a cheaper option than the discontinued 690, so it’s the best option, even without the virtual wall.

You can buy this part separately while still spending less than 690.

3 reasons to buy Roomba 675

1. Cheaper than 690: The 675 is less expensive than the 690 which makes it a better alternative of the two.
2. A rug suitable for deep cleaning: Even with low airflow, it picked up 83% of the built-in sand on medium-pile carpeting.
3. Dirt Detection: He tells the robot to focus on the dirty areas, which is why it cleans the existing dirt well.

2 reasons to buy Roomba 690

1. default wall: This variant has a virtual wall, while 675 does not. This device blocks the path of the robot from restricted areas of your home.
2. Excellent at cleaning dirt Included: A score of 85.16% out of 690 is one of The best among all robot vacuums I have tested in this class.

Verdict: Roomba 675 is a better alternative

I like the Roomba 675 better because it’s a lot cheaper on Amazon.

Even if you buy two virtual walls, you will still spend less than 690.

Be aware that prices are volatile and may change at any time.

The bottom line is that these two robots are the same products with slight differences in color, accessories and dust box latch.

As long as 675 remains at its current price levels, it is better to buy from 690.